“I think it is significant for the judiciary to reflect on these broader implications of what this agreement does for people`s human rights,” she said. Although the Canadian government states that the United States still meets all of the STCA criteria (for example. A good human rights record, refugee advocates argue that it is more rhetorical than realistic. They express human rights concerns about the impact of the travel ban on refugees and asylum seekers. The anti-immigration rhetoric created by the executive has fuelled fears about human rights and the safety of refugees. There have been numerous cases of xenophobia and racism against refugees and migrants, who are visible minorities. Third, if the proposed agreement were similar to the agreement between the United States and Canada, it would probably have different exceptions. The U.S.-Canada agreement provides exceptions for unaccompanied minors (in accordance with the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child), asylum seekers with a family member legally in the United States, and asylum seekers with valid U.S. visas. If officials use this agreement as a model for an agreement between the United States and Mexico, these exceptions could ultimately represent a significant portion of all asylum cases submitted, as unaccompanied children alone account for 19% of Central American centennials who arrive at the U.S.-Mexico border in fiscal 2017. In the first year of the U.S.-Canada agreement, approximately 75% of asylum seekers at the common border qualified for one of the exceptions to the agreement.
Prime Minister Trudeau must do the right thing, defend human rights and ultimately suspend the agreement on safe third countries. ” (Refugees) are no longer safe under the Trump administration – and we need to do something about it,” Singh said in June 2018, referring to a policy widely condemned by the Trump administration to separate migrant children from their parents. The United States is the only country that has considered Canada a safe third country. Both governments are confident that the other government can make government arrangements for each refugee application received. As a result, refugees seeking asylum in the United States can only do so in Canada (and vice versa) in certain cases.  TEN: Canada slams the door on refugees. The goal and impact of the agreement is to reduce the number of refugees who can apply for refugee protection in Canada. In implementing this agreement, Canada is partnering with a sad group of countries that are adopting the “not in my backyard” approach for refugees. Even before the introduction of the Third Country Security Agreement, 2004 is expected to be the lowest year for refugee applications in Canada.